I’ve recently had three different clients ask me for a
second opinion on an IRS situation because they had doubts about their tax
position. Turned out in all cases their doubts were well founded. In two of the
cases, the clients signed with the IRS first, then consulted me. In the third,
the client consulted first. Check out how much better the third client fared:
Client 1 had been audited by the IRS. The agent proposed a
tax increase of several hundred thousand dollars. Under pressure from a tax
return preparer he had hired to assist him in the audit, the client signed off
on the changes made by the agent. Did he give up his rights completely? No. He
could still seek a refund. But he would have to pay the tax first, which he has
not been able to do. Until he can, the IRS can exercise its enforcement power
to collect the tax, even though a large portion of it likely isn’t owed. Had he
not signed off on the audit, he could be fighting the issue in Tax Court, before having to pay the tax.
Client 2 signed her tax return, as prepared by her return
preparer, and filed, even though she was not comfortable with the tax liability
reflected. When she mentioned this to me at a meeting on an entirely different
matter, I ultimately concluded that she’d failed to claim a substantial loss.
She amended her tax return to claim the loss. But amended returns are
scrutinized more closely than original returns. Her amended return was audited.
Although the IRS allowed the loss, it made unfavorable changes to other items
on the return.
Client 3 thought her tax return wasn’t quite correct. Before
filing, she asked me to take a look. I found a mistake in the treatment of the
foreclosure on her house. The return was corrected, with a substantial tax
savings.
The bottom line: If you are in doubt regarding an IRS matter, get your questions answered before you sign.
As a business and tax attorney serving Arizona for nearly 25 years, the philosophy behind my legal practice has remained constant. I maintain the highest level of responsiveness to my clients’ needs, solve legal problems in the most cost-effective, yet creative manner and take on no more work than I can do well.
Although I am a solo practitioner, my network of lawyers with complimentary areas of expertise is extensive. Through those affiliations, my clients often are able to obtain the same breadth of expertise as they would with a large firm, but with the personal touch and attentiveness of a small firm with a client-centered environment.

0 comments:
Post a Comment